Barelds, D. P. H., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2007). Ties certainly one of partner character feature resemblance, relationship onset, relationship high quality, and you will love. [ Website links ]

Baxter, L. An effective., & West, L. (2003). Few attitudes of its parallels and you can variations: A great dialectical position. Journal regarding Individual and Public Relationship, 20, 491-514. [ Backlinks ]

Berscheid, E. (1985)patibility, interdependence, and emotion. Inside W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you will incompatible relationship (pp. 143-161). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]

Berscheid, E., Dion, K., Walster, Age., & Walster, Grams. W. (1971). Bodily appeal and you can relationship solutions: An examination of your coordinating theory. Journal away from Experimental Personal Therapy, eight, 173-189. [ Website links ]

Record of Personal and private Relationships, 24, 479-496

Berscheid, Elizabeth., & Regan, P. (2005). The latest psychology of interpersonal dating. Top Seat Lake, NJ: Pearson Studies (Prentice Hall). [ Website links ]

Berger, C. Roentgen. (1975). Task abilities and you may attributional communication because the determinants regarding interpersonal appeal. Speech Monographs, forty, 280-286. [ Backlinks ]

Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Interest and you may romantic relationship. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The fresh manual out-of social psychology (Vol. 2, last ed. Pp. 193-281). Ny: McGraw-Mountain. [ Hyperlinks ]

Buckwalter, J. Grams., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, G. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, N. C. (2004, Could possibly get eleven). You.S. Patent 6,735,568. Washington, DC. [ Website links ]

Buckwalter, J. G., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, Grams. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, N. C. (2008, The fall of. 18). You.S. Patent 7,454,357B2. Arizona, DC. [ Backlinks ]

Buss, D. M. (1984). Relationship variety having character dispositions: Investigations with three more analysis present. Decisions Family genes, fourteen, 111-123. [ Backlinks ]

Byrne, D., & Rhamey, Roentgen. (1965). Magnitude out of negative and positive reinforcements because a determinant off destination. Log from Character and min recension här you may Societal Mindset, 2, 884-889. [ Website links ]

Carter, S. R. (2005, Feb.), To possess progressive-big date Cupids, study substitute dating: Psychological technology are about the newest winning fits produced within eHarmony. Connection to have Mental Research Observer, 18. Downloaded from [ Links ]

Carter, S. Roentgen., & Buckwalter, J. Grams. (2009). Improving partner choices over the internet: A comparison away from dating quality ranging from marriage ceremonies arising from an on-line matchmaking program and you can marriage ceremonies due to unfettered options. Interpersona: A worldwide Log to your Private Dating, step three, 105-125. [ Links ]

Carter, S., & Accumulated snow, C. (2004, May). Enabling single men and women go into most readily useful marriage ceremonies playing with predictive different types of relationship triumph. Report displayed from the 16th Annual Meeting of your own American Mental Community. [ Hyperlinks ]

Approach and program having distinguishing those people who are going to have a flourishing relationship

C). How come character count in ination regarding attribute nervousness, negativity, and you will marital fulfillment. Diary out-of Identity and Personal Mindset, 78, 326-336. [ Hyperlinks ]

Clark, Meters. S. (1985). Effects away from matchmaking type getting insights compatibility. In the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you may in conflict relationship (pp. 119-140). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]

Coombs, Roentgen. H., & Kenkel, W. F. (1966). Sex differences in relationship aspiration and you will satisfaction with pc-establish partners. Log regarding ily, twenty-eight, 62-66. [ Hyperlinks ]

Cooper, An effective., & Sportolari, L. (1997). Romance on the net: Information on line attraction. Diary out of Sex Training and you will Cures, twenty two, 7-fourteen. [ Website links ]

Dijkstra, P., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2008). Do individuals know what they need: The same or complementary partner? Evolutionary Mindset, six, 595-602. [ Links ]

Feingold, A beneficial. (1988). Complimentary to possess attractiveness for the romantic couples and you can exact same-sex members of the family: A good meta-studies and theoretic complaints. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 226-235. [ Website links ]

Felmlee, D. H. (2001). Regarding attractive to terrible: Disenchantment that have an enchanting lover. Sociological Viewpoints, 49, 263-280. [ Links ]